Professionals
There were 437 (270 people) participants, who were recruited via in public areas available websites. The mean decades are 23 decades (SD = 5.96). Users have been expected to accomplish some surveys some of which are not relevant into the latest research. All of the victims gave its advised agree towards the release of their sample scores getting look purposes, and all were provided opinions toward standard result of the research. This new dataset analysed for the current investigation is obtainable at the
Measures
Vulnerable narcissism is counted to the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale of the Hendin and Cheek (1997) regarding the Polish interpretation (find Czarna mais aussi al. 2014). They include ten factors that have a beneficial Likert-including response scale from one (highly differ) so you can 5 (highly concur).
Grandiose narcissism try reviewed to your confirmed Gloss type (Bazinska and you will Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your Narcissistic Identification Catalog (Raskin and Hallway 1979). The things was chose basing on the basis studies (loadings exceeding .40) and you may represented the next subscales of your NPI: Power (eleven items), Self-Sufficiency (7), Mirror (5), and Exhibitionism (11). Respondents rated their standard of approval of every statement using a beneficial Likert-sort of response structure, in one (cannot apply at me) so you can 5 (pertains to me). The sum items brings an index out-of grandiose narcissism. It has been shown has just the Likert structure NPI exhibits comparable build legitimacy and you will somewhat improved precision on brand-new pushed-options style (Miller et al. 2018a).
The top Five was examined having Polish type (Strus mais aussi al. 2014) of Around the globe Character Items Pool – Large Four Element Scale (BFAS; DeYoung ainsi que al. 2007). This is a 100-item measure of attribute domain names (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Transparency/Intellect) therefore the one or two down-purchase areas of each domain name (Volatility, Detachment, Mercy, Complimentary, Industriousness, Orderliness, Warmth, Assertiveness, Intelligence, and you will Transparency). Participants was questioned to rate simply how much the new comments is associated on them on the a beneficial Likert-types of level, from (strongly disagree) to help you 5 (highly consent).
Performance
Very first, we looked at the correlations between several variants regarding narcissism and you may identification qualities as well as domain names and you may issue (Dining table step 1). One another type of narcissism correlated with characteristics within the an equivalent solution to early in the day research (age.grams. Miller mais aussi al. 2011). Specifically, vulnerable narcissism is actually surely synchronised with Neuroticism, and you may negatively of the Agreeableness and you can Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism correlated certainly having Extraversion, Openness/Intelligence and you may Conscientiousness, and adversely which have Neuroticism and you will Agreeableness.
Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism mingle2 phone number and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).