Regardless of if our very own analyses pick a good fit into study, i checked if other model could match the content just as better otherwise better (MacCallum, Wegener, Uchino, & Fabrigar, 1993). Figure 2 gift ideas this inversed causation alternative design below.
A choice exploratory structural model: Let’s say sexual prejudice forecasts communication and you will positive feel having homosexuals, imagined similarity that have peers’ perceptions towards the homosexuality, and you may religiosity. The solid outlines depict mathematically extreme pathways during the .05 top. Magnitudes off connection is presented with the high quality problems in parentheses; X dos (61, N = 360) = . Normed (NFI), non-normed (NNFI), and you may relative (CFI) goodness-of-match is actually .91, .91, .93, respectively; RMSEA is actually .09.
Theoretically, it is simply since the probable that individuals having higher bad attitudes towards homosexuality perform eliminate reaching homosexual people and you will lesbians, rating the affairs due to the fact bad, seeing their friends since the that have other attitudes to your homosexual some body, or see reassurance regarding their philosophy within religiosity
The fresh option design got a good fit, [? dos (61, N = 360) = , p 2 =11%); self-confident feel that have gay guys and lesbians (?=-.fifty, se = .06, p 2 =25%); recognized fellow similarities in their attitudes towards the homosexuals (?=-.19, se = .08, p dos =4%); and you may, religiosity (?=.forty-eight, se = .04, p dos =23%). Tall correlations was receive toward disturbances regarding perceived parallels having peers’ attitudes for the homosexuals and their prior affairs that have homosexual guys and you can lesbians (r=.18, se = .06, p 2 =.11); 25% from participants’ self-confident event with gay someone (R 2 =.25); 4% from fellow similarities that have gay group (Roentgen 2 =.04); and 23% out of religiosity (R dos =.23).
While you are such email address details are distinguished, i compared which model fitting the information finest by using the Model AIC and you may Model CAIC coefficients to possess low-nested design comparisons each models’ fit indices. The first model got a better complement (Design AIC=; Model CAIC=-; NFI = .92; NNFI = .92; CFI = .94; RMSEA = .08) compared to the option design (Design AIC = & CAIC=-; NFI = .91; NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .09). The real difference during the match along the several habits suggests our very own modern model’s theoretical rationale matches the data most readily useful (Byrne, 1994).
Conversation
We developed an architectural design to check on whether or not relations and confident knowledge with homosexuals, recognized similarities having peers’ attitudes on homosexuality, and you may religiosity was indeed predictive off intimate bias one of a people away from Puerto Rican teenagers. Our very own results strongly recommend most of the hidden variables, apart from peers’ perceptions on homosexuality, forecast participants’ sexual bias into homosexual anyone. When you’re early Agri women for marriage in the day experts discovered sexual bias is generally large for men than just lady (Kite, 1992; Herek, 2000b), we were struggling to simulate these types of overall performance.
What number of gay individuals recognized from the professionals smaller its reported intimate bias to your homosexual people. This finding implies that Puerto Rican youth’s intimate bias are influenced by having less exposure to gays and you will lesbians. The fresh new stigmatization regarding homosexual anyone on the Puerto Rican community will get restrict particular students’ experience of homosexual guys and you may lesbians. Within population, bringing during the-category panels with homosexual men and lesbians, including, can get facilitate students’ relations with homosexual people and you may lesbians. Other experts discovered this type of class room situations fall off certain heterosexual’s negative appraisals into the gay men and you will lesbians (Sakalli & Ugurlu, 2001).
Our results along with advise that participants’ self-confident experiences which have homosexual boys and you will lesbians use an impact in their sexual bias into the homosexual some one. Participants’ remember of self-confident knowledge which have gay guys and you will lesbians is actually highly predictive of the sexual prejudice. Furthermore, the presence of an optimistic organization between participants’ interactions with homosexuals as well as their remember away from self-confident skills with this particular category suggests an iterative techniques which Puerto Rican teenagers you certainly will improve or fall off their intention to engage that have gay someone in the afterwards moments. These types of findings recommend that Puerto Rican younger adults’ appraisals of their exposure to gay men and women are especially important within the structure and you can implementation of facts to lessen intimate bias. Facts and setup creating a breeding ground in which anticipate and you may unlock discussion try normalized could possibly get helps self-confident interchanges. Research about what constitutes self-confident event between Puerto Rican heterosexual and you can homosexual men needs.